You know when you imagine what a character from a book looks
like, when you see them, know how they smell, how they walk, their hand
gestures, the way their eye lashes flap about when they blink, you know the
sound of their voice and know all the intricacies of their persona. I feel I
know a huge chunk of the characters in the books I have read, I even identify
things I consider unique to them amongst real life human beings.
I remember once I saw a little girl with a messy blonde bob, lively and mischievous
looking and I could not help but, think “oh my, she looks exactly like Scout
from the book To Kill A Mockingbird.”
It is therefore always interesting to see movies based on
those very familiar characters from one’s favourite books but, I imagine it must
be the most daunting of tasks to attempt to make accurately visual all the
detail contained within a book. You have to find the right setting, the right
props, work with great precision on the dialogue and cast the right actors.
On countless occasions I have found that film buffs rely on their audiences to
be stupid and inattentive, expecting to be spoon fed and do none of the
thinking for themselves. I think sometimes they live in hope that we may not
have read the book and that they can then make additions or subtractions or
pointless modifications to a storyline that may have great as is.
I was excited to come across the movie adaptation of J.M.
Coetzee’s Disgrace, a book I have come to hold in very high regard. The book
tells the story of a Middle-aged divorcee whose life takes a detour after he is
found to have been sleeping with a student at the Collage where he works as a
lecturer. He moves to his daughter’s farm and for a time he finds calm in being
there, this till a brutal attack by three young men on him and Lucy (his
daughter).
The narrative deals competently with issues of aging, sex and power shifts all
the while being smart and real. The movie attempts this and although on some
counts they manage to do a good job or replicating or rather adapting the book
to the movie, there are things I think are vital to the story that the movie
does not deliver on. They sourced the location beautifully but, this could not
have been easier for them since the books author went into great detail
describing the scene. The characters were a bit hit and miss for me, for one; I
think the casting director did a great job of casting for the characters of
Lucy, Soraya and Bev Shaw but, missed the mark with regards to the protagonist
David Lurie (played by John Malkovich), playing the part of the tall, handsome man (as described in the
book) is a shabby looking, scrawny and not at all handsome boy, Patrick who is
described as having a weathered face and shrewd eyes is played by a man who
looks timeworn as opposed to weathered and no wisdom can be found in his eyes
in any form.

Some of the story’s peaks are lost in the movie, due to minute inconsistencies
and a failure to mind the detail.
I understand that a movie is limited by time and sometimes
even budget and that an author can afford to be as detailed as they wish
without having to pay these two factors much consideration but, when taking an
original work and replicating it, I think it is always best to either go big or
not go at all. I think turning a book into a movie can sometimes be like putting
a beautiful Amel Lerrieux or Adele song over some mundane and futile house beat
all so someone else can reap the benefits of somebody else’s hard work.
Never the less, here are some movies that were adapted from books that I think were done pretty well: